Grid coordination software

Stop managing network constraints.
Start coordinating them.

Enleashed gives DNSPs and system operators a real-time coordination layer that resolves local constraints through designed market logic — reducing curtailment, deferring capex, and improving hosting capacity without replacing existing infrastructure.

See use cases → Book a conversation Live demo ↗
£1–2bn
Annual UK constraint & curtailment costs — the direct cost of uncoordinated networks
National Grid ESO
20%+
Hosting capacity uplift achievable through feeder-level coordination of flexible demand
SLES pilot evidence
£0
Market rule changes required — works within existing regulatory frameworks today
Regulatory assessment
The problem

Reactive constraint management doesn't scale.

As DER penetration rises, managing local network constraints through after-the-fact interventions is growing faster than the networks themselves.

Today — reactive
Static or conservative dynamic operating envelopes
Curtailment as the default congestion response
Separate, fragmented flexibility procurement processes
Network augmentation as the primary long-term solution
Rising balancing costs with no structural fix
With Enleashed — proactive
Dynamic, real-time coordination around constraints
Curtailment becomes avoidable through market signals
Continuous coordination — no separate procurement needed
Capex deferral through maximised asset utilisation
Structured, auditable coordination with formal guarantees
Architecture

Where does this sit relative to wholesale markets?

The most common question we receive. The answer is architectural — Enleashed fills a gap that wholesale markets were never designed to occupy.

Wholesale layer

Schedules and hedges

Forward scheduling, hedging, and investment signals at the timescale of hours and the spatial resolution of regions and zones. Does not see individual feeders or real-time local conditions. Was never designed to.

Enleashed — coordination layer

Real-time local allocation

Takes wholesale schedules as a given input. Observes feeder-level conditions — voltage, congestion, available flexibility — and coordinates who gets access, when, and how much. Fills the gap wholesale cannot see.

Relationship

Complementary, not competing

Wholesale sets the upstream boundary conditions. Enleashed operates within them. It improves wholesale market outcomes as a side effect: by shaping the demand profile wholesale dispatches against toward one that is flatter, smoother, and better aligned with renewable availability.

One sentence: Enleashed takes wholesale schedules as inputs, resolves local constraints that wholesale cannot see, and publishes bounded coordination signals that flexible devices respond to — without modifying, replacing, or competing with wholesale market mechanisms.

The missing third dimension

Electricity is not just energy and timing. It is also reliability.

Today’s markets implicitly assume that if energy is bought and flexibility is procured somewhere in the system, reliability will follow. In practice, it does not. What matters at the point of use is whether a household, EV, battery, or business is served when the network is under stress.

That missing dimension is reliability: the quality of service a participant receives when local constraints bind. Today, reliability is not something customers or devices explicitly choose. It is determined indirectly by feeder conditions, procurement rules, and operational interventions they cannot see.

Enleashed makes this explicit. Instead of treating flexibility as a standalone product procured separately from the customer experience, Enleashed allows the system to coordinate around the thing that actually matters: who gets access, when, and with what priority under stress.

In other words, Enleashed turns reliability into something that can be designed, priced, and delivered — while using flexible demand and distributed assets as the mechanism for delivering it.

Today, we procure flexibility and hope it delivers reliability.
Enleashed procures reliability directly — and uses flexibility to deliver it.

Today — flexibility procured in isolation
Flexibility is bought separately through tenders, ancillary services, or bilateral arrangements.
Reliability is experienced elsewhere by households, EVs, and businesses facing local network stress.
No direct causal link between what is procured and who is ultimately served during constraint.
Over-procurement and mis-procurement are common because the system buys coarse products to solve precise local problems.
With Enleashed — reliability procured directly
Reliability becomes explicit — a designed service level, not an accidental by-product.
Flexible demand becomes the execution layer used to deliver that service in real time.
Access is allocated continuously based on local network state, available flexibility, and system rules.
Less waste, better targeting — the system solves the local reliability problem directly instead of buying generic flexibility and hoping it lands correctly.
Simple example — 20 EVs on one constrained feeder
Legacy model

Procure flexibility, then react

A DSO procures flexibility through a separate process. At 6pm, vehicles plug in, the feeder tightens, and some charging is reduced or deferred. The intervention works physically, but the link between what was bought and who experiences reduced service is indirect and opaque.

Enleashed model

Procure reliability, then deliver it

The feeder is coordinated in real time. Charging access is allocated continuously using local scarcity, network conditions, and available flexibility. Devices respond automatically, and service quality is delivered intentionally rather than emerging accidentally from a separate procurement process.

The result: better use of flexible demand, less unnecessary procurement, lower curtailment, and a clearer path from system coordination to customer experience. This is the shift from buying flexibility as a disconnected product to delivering reliability as a designed service.

How it works

Four steps. Continuous operation.

The coordination engine runs on a rolling cycle aligned to dispatch intervals. No manual intervention required.

01

Ingest network state

Consumes feeder topology, voltage time series, thermal limits, congestion indices, and dynamic operating envelope profiles from DNSP systems via API. Updated each interval.

02

Compute local scarcity

Combines instantaneous supply–demand balance, forecast conditions, and physical network signals (voltage deviation, congestion) into a composite scarcity measure — per feeder, per interval. No centralised OPF required.

03

Generate coordination signals

Maps scarcity to bounded buy/sell prices. High scarcity attracts supply and defers flexible demand. Surplus periods recruit flexible load to absorb renewables. Signals are bounded by design.

04

Allocate and settle

Determines who gets access, when, and how much — with fairness memory that ensures under-served participants are prioritised in subsequent intervals. Produces auditable settlement artefacts.

Coordination output — feeder NW-047
Network inputs
Voltage deviation+1.8%
Congestion index0.91
Available export (kW)142
Computed scarcity
Instant α0.74
Forecast α0.92
Network α0.63
Composite α̃0.61
Signals out
Buy signal£87 / MWh
Sell signal£112 / MWh
Fair Play active3 participants
Convergence q0.946
Use cases

Three operator problems. One coordination layer.

The same mechanism addresses the most pressing distribution network challenges.

Evidence base

Built on what pilots have proven.

Enleashed is the synthesis of what existing pilots proved possible and what they left incomplete.

01

Project EDGE — DER marketplaces are feasible

Distribution-level flexibility markets can operate. Gap remaining: not continuous, not feeder-native. Enleashed closes this with a continuously operating coordination kernel.

02

Project Edith — local dynamic pricing works

Local dynamic price signals drive coordinated behavioural response. Gap remaining: limited scope. Enleashed extends this to feeder-level multi-participant allocation.

03

Project Converge — DER can substitute network capex

Coordinated DER can defer augmentation. Gap remaining: allocation was rule-based. Enleashed replaces rule-based allocation with continuously operating market logic.

04

PhD research — formal stability and fairness

The mechanism is grounded in PhD research at Imperial College London. Proven convergence, bounded pricing, and fairness compatibility — not a heuristic.

17,500+
Dispatch intervals simulated — adequacy preserved, congestion reduced by >90%
0.946
Convergence rate q — stable allocation guaranteed within every dispatch interval
£52
Mean coordination signal vs £1,968 in an uncoordinated architecture — same adequacy delivered
Shaun Sweeney
"The core problem is coordination. Today's markets cannot dynamically match supply and demand at the speed and granularity required. This results in wasted clean energy, higher system costs, and slower decarbonisation — and it is solvable."
Shaun Sweeney — Founder & CEO · PhD Imperial College London About the team →
Get started

Ready to coordinate your network?

We're working with DNSPs, system operators, and flexibility aggregators on initial pilot deployments. If you're managing distribution-level constraints, we want to talk.

Book a conversation → Explore use cases Live demo ↗